All posts by admin

Che sorpresa ti aspetta nel vivace casinò lazybar: generosi bonus, giri gratuiti e una selezione di giochi colorati renderanno la tua serata fantastica.

Bay City to Detroit high speed bus route studied

From The Flint Journal

FLINT — The Mass Transportation Authority wants know whether commuters from as far north as Bay City would support a high-speed bus service to Detroit, a potential first step toward establishing a light rail route through Flint in the future.

A Genesee County committee has approved plans to study establishing a “bus rapid transit” system along I-75, including the possibility of a dedicated lane of traffic, more comfortable coaches and new stations for commuters to catch their rides from.
An MTA official said the idea may never become reality or could be 10-25 years away, but said it’s worth pursuing because of continuing demand from workers trying to get to jobs that are outside Genesee County.
The idea is of interest to officials at the Saginaw Transit Authority, said General Manager Sylvester Payne, especially if the price of gasoline drives more workers out of their cars and into public transportation in the future.

Lawmakers still skeptical of Detroit-Lansing rail proposal

From the Lansing State Journal

State lawmakers have switched on a flashing caution light for a proposed high-speed rail line between Detroit and Lansing.

Project investors must disclose financing details before the state can get on board, members of a legislative task force said Tuesday. But although questions remain about the financing and the viability of the project, members recommended further study of it.

In June, Michigan-based Interstate Traveler Co. LLC, or ITC, renewed its proposal for the high-tech system as part of a public-private partnership. It would use public rights of way along Interstate 96 and other highways but no taxpayer money.

The rail would run off solar-powered hydrogen and use magnetic levitation technology to propel rail cars about 200 miles per hour. It would cost $10 million a mile to build.

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20100120/NEWS04/1200311/1005/NEWS04

Michigan transit projects expected to get more funding

From the Detroit Free Press

Chances rose today for an infusion of federal money for transit projects in Michigan after the Obama administration signaled a change in how it will fund major public transportation initiatives.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said new transit funding guidelines will place a greater emphasis on “livability issues,” including whether projects provide economic development and environmental benefits. LaHood said the projects’ costs and the commuting time they save will still be considered, but those two factors will no longer be the primary criteria, a restriction enacted under former President George Bush.

“I’ll make sure those investments in manufacturing help our most distressed communities in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere,” LaHood said in remarks prepared for a luncheon during the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C.

Additional federal funding could boost efforts to build a light rail along Woodward in Detroit and a high-speed rail between Detroit and Chicago.

http://www.freep.com/article/201001131705/NEWS06/100113068

Michigan Ridership Growth 2000 – 2009

Route Round Trips Passengers  Growth
per Day 2003 – 2009 2003 – 2009
Blue Water          
Port Huron to 1 80,890 132,851 64%
Chicago          
Pere Marquette          
Grand Rapids to 1 73,392 103,246 41%
Chicago          
Wolverine          
Pontiac/Detroit to 3 326,367 444,127 36%
Chicago          
  Wolverine Blue Water Pere Marquette   Total   Wolverine/3
FY 2000 320,383 108,266 64,825   493,474   106,794
FY 2001 295,227 105,114 58,836   459,177   98,409
FY 2002 299,729 91,714 60,127   451,570   99,910
FY 2003 326,367 80,890 73,392   480,649   108,789
FY 2004 366,291 94,378 87,767   548,436   122,097
FY 2005 406,499 111,630 96,471   614,600   135,500
FY 2006 438,529 123,823 101,932   664,284   146,176
FY 2007 449,107 127,642 104,819   681,568   149,702
FY 2008 472,393 136,538 111,716   720,647   157,464
FY 2009 444,127 132,851 103,246   680,224   148,042
               
% gain 2000-2008 47.4% 26.1% 72.3%   46.0%    
% gain 2000-2009 38.6% 22.7% 59.3%   37.8%    
% gain last 7 yrs 36.1% 64.2% 40.7%   41.5%    
% gain last 6 yrs 21.2% 40.8% 17.6%   24.0%    
% gain last 5 yrs 9.3% 19.0% 7.0%   10.7%    
               
% gain 2007-2008 5.2% 7.0% 6.6%   5.7%    
% gain 2008-2009 -6.0% -2.7% -7.6%   -5.6%    
               
% gain lowest to highest year 60.0% 68.8% 89.9%   56.9%