Category Archives: News

Che sorpresa ti aspetta nel vivace casinò lazybar: generosi bonus, giri gratuiti e una selezione di giochi colorati renderanno la tua serata fantastica.

Advocates tell residents to lobby for better rail service

From AnnArbor.com

City of Ann Arbor transportation manager Eli Cooper drew a line between two dots representing Detroit and Ann Arbor on a large Michigan map.

“The first goes here,” he said referring to what he and many others see as the first priority for an improved rail line in Michigan.

Area residents at the Michigan By Rail public forum Thursday night at Washtenaw Community College were instructed to put stickers on large maps representing important places in Michigan, then draw lines where they would like to see rail service developed. Cooper chose Detroit to Ann Arbor, and one of his group members quickly picked up a marker and drew the next line from Ann Arbor to Chicago.

A pattern quickly emerged as the roughly 10 groups of about 10 people filled in their maps. They connected the cities of southern Michigan’s urbanized network to Chicago and some lines went north to the state’s tourist destinations.

Read more: http://www.annarbor.com/news/rail-advocates-at-public-forum-tell-residents-to-push-the-economic-benefits-of-rail-1/

Muskegon residents are asking for passenger rail service along the lakeshore

From the Muskegon Chronicle

Muskegon community leaders and train aficionados are hoping for a “choo-choo” under their Christmas tree.

They gathered this week to contemplate the future of train service in Michigan. With dreams of restoring passenger rail service to Muskegon and even creating a lakeshore tourist route to Mackinaw City, it might take Santa Claus to make such rail expansion a reality.

Amtrak has been a struggling national train system that relies on subsidies at a time federal budget deficits are a critical issue. Currently, the closest service to Muskegon is Amtrak’s Pere Marquette line from Grand Rapids to Chicago, with a stop in Holland.

More than 50 people gathered at the Shoreline Inn and Suites Wednesday to provide a Muskegon perspective for the ongoing Michigan State Rail Plan, which will be completed in June.

Read more: http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2010/12/muskegon_residents_are_asking.html

Michigan not on list of states receiving high-speed rail funding turned down by Ohio and Wisconsin

From AnnArbor.com

Federal high-speed rail grant money turned down by Wisconsin and Ohio will be redirected to about a dozen other states eager to help develop high-speed rail corridors, and Michigan isn’t on the list of receivers, federal officials announced this afternoon.

The incoming Republican governors in Wisconsin and Ohio indicated recently they would not move forward to use federal high-speed rail money. That left the federal government trying to find other states that would accept the money, and several jumped at the chance.

The Michigan Legislature still has not agreed to match the $161 million it recently was granted for high-speed rail improvements along the Detroit-to-Chicago corridor. The Republican-controlled Michigan Senate declined to take action to put up the $37 million state match needed to trigger the federal dollars before the most recent legislative session ended.

Read more: http://www.annarbor.com/news/michigan-not-on-list-of-states-receiving-high-speed-rail-funding-turned-down-by-ohio-and-wisconsin/

Passenger rail future is topic of Muskegon public meeting

From the Muskegon Chronicle

The public is invited to a forum Wednesday evening on the future of Michigan’s passenger rail transportation.

The open meeting is scheduled for 6 to 8 p.m. at the Shoreline Inn and Conference Center, 750 Terrace Point Blvd.

Residents are encouraged to speak out on how best to improve passenger and freight rail service. The forum is sponsored by the Michigan Environmental Council, the Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, the Michigan Municipal League and the hotel as well as other economic development and civic groups, governments and unions.

Elected officials expected to participate include state Sen. Gerald VanWoerkom, R-Norton Shores; his elected successor, Rep. Goeff Hansen, R-Hart; Muskegon County Board of Commissioners Chairman Kevin Mahoney, Muskegon City Commissioner Clara Shepard and Montague Mayor Henry Roesler Jr.

The session is part of a series of 16 throughout the state. Citizen ideas will be forwarded to state and federal policymakers.

Passenger rail advocates, including some environmentalists, call it a tool to revitalize cities, reduce freeway and airport congestion, create “green” construction and manufacturing jobs and cut air pollution.

Each forum includes an overview of the existing rail system, an interactive rail mapping session, discussion of financing options, and a vision for a Michigan high-speed rail system.

Previous forums have been in Grand Rapids, Holland, Kalamazoo, Jackson, Flint, Detroit and other cities. The final forum is Thursday in Ann Arbor. See http://www.michiganbyrail.org for more details.

Partners for the Muskegon forum include the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees & Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Divisions of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters; United Transportation Union; Get Michigan Moving; Disability Connection – West Michigan; Community Foundation for Muskegon County; West Michigan Veterans Inc.; City of Montague; Muskegon Area Chamber of Commerce; West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission; and West Michigan Lakeshore Association of Realtors.

$161M On The Line: Will Michigan See High-Speed Rail?

From Michigan Now/Interlochen Public Radio

A month ago, Michigan’s congressmen and senators were hailing the federal government, which would be sending $161 million dollars for high speed rail. Track improvements might mean a trip from Detroit to Chicago in just three hours.

But a struggling state government would have to find a way to match those federal dollars, if Michigan is to see any actual money. Last week the state legislature quit for 2010 without allotting the matching funds.

Transit advocates are disappointed. While there’s still a chance at the money, they say this could be a big setback.

 Legislators stayed up all night last week Thursday. It was their last chance to vote. Almost two-thirds of them are term limited out, including the leader of the state Senate, Republican Mike Bishop from Rochester Hills.

“As a republican I’ve stuck my neck out on the transit issue,” Bishop says.

The Director of the Michigan Department of Transportation stuck his neck out too. Kirk Steudle’s team spent six months figuring out the engineering and the financing for high speed rail.

“It’s my job as a transportation professional of 25 years in this field to say, ‘Here’s what’s happening and here’s how we can make this work better,'” he says. “But at the end of the day it’s still governed by legislative action.”

Steudle planned for the state to sell $45 million dollars in bonds. Meanwhile, the federal government has been holding that $161 million dollars, waiting to see the state match. It’s a four-to-one dollar value, which a chance at hundreds-of-millions more in a possible bonus later on.

The state house approved MDOT’s plan a month ago, and things were looking good. Bishop had said he would also let his chamber vote on the issue. But that didn’t happen.

In the end, Bishop says: “I don’t ask the state taxpayers to finance anything unless a business plan is presented that gives us some indication that it brings value.”

Michigan lawmakers are not the only ones to raise questions about the value of the federal rail monies. Ohio and Wisconsin were supposed to get $1.2 billion dollars for high speed rail, but their new tea party-elect governors say they want the money for roads.

The Obama Administration says this money is for rail only.  So it will give the money to someone else.

The plan was to finance the state match with bonds.

“Who pays for the bonds?” Senator Roger Kahn asks. The answer is: taxpayers.

“The legislature failing to act is really putting us at a competitive disadvantage to the other states. It’s saying we’re stuck in the past,” says Cece Grant. The native Detroiter spent two years in Washington D.C. with Transportation for America. In July, she came home to be their Michigan organizer. Grant wishes transit were more than eight percent of the MDOT budget.

“There’s no way for your employees to get back and forth to work,” she says. “We’re not a mobile society. We don’t have bustling thriving downtowns.”

Railway advocates like Cece Grant are pessimistic about the new legislature, and cautiously optimistic about the new governor. Michigan will go the way of Ohio and Wisconsin, losing the federal rail money, if the new governor and lawmakers don’t act quickly in 2011.

Listen to this story at: http://ipr.interlochen.org/ipr-news-features/episode/11256